Ether Frolics Steampunk stories
  Welcome, Guest. Please Login
Blaylock Forum
 
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister

 • Jump to the Blaylock indexTrouble logging in? Contact us
 
Post Reply
Open Live Preview Live Preview
Message Icon:
Name:
Email:
Your Verification Code is:
Please type exactly what text appears in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and it is case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Subject:
Message:
                       
 
  Max 2000 characters. Remaining characters:
Disable Smilies: Check this if you'll be adding code (or don't like smilies).
Shortcuts (Modern Browsers Only): Press alt+s to Send, alt+p to Preview, or alt+r to Reset
    


Topic Summary - Displaying 15 post(s).
Posted by: NightRelic Posted on: 27. Nov 2010 at 07:15
The only books I've recommended have been The Last Coin (usually goes over well) and Night Relics (the person never actually read it, but I think a lot of people could get into Blaylock through this book). I'm going to try to get my Philip K.Dick book club to read The Last Coin at some point when we're ready to read some of his friends.
Posted by: jhagman Posted on: 16. Jul 2008 at 23:41
What would be really fun would be to read "The Road To Balumnia", Blaylock's original version of the "Stone Giant".
Posted by: isabeats Posted on: 16. Jul 2008 at 16:29
I am re-reading "The Stone Giant" this week. I've re-read every Blaylock novel numerous times each and can't wait to re-read "Land of Dreams" for the 9th or tenth time.

Mike- try "The Sheep Look Up"- it's well worth it.

Another GREAT book, intended for children but I still enjoy it, is Alexander key's "The Forgotten Door."
Posted by: Mike Posted on: 09. Jul 2008 at 18:41
The first Blaylock I read was "The Stone Giant".  I didn't know anything about the author, or that it was a sequel or prequel or whatever you call it.  I didn't even know it was funny, but I loved it.  

I was 12 years old.

In college, I still thought fondly of it, like a good old fanasy book, and I thought of reading it again.  When I did read it again, I couldn't believe it was the same book.  

It was the scene where Escargot was threatening Stover with the make-shift blackjack in the pub.  I couldn't have been expected to pick up on that at 12 years old, it was too subtle.  But it was like reading a whole different story.  

I had no idea how much of a complete dead-beat Escargot was, no pie seemed enough to justify anything at 12, he was simply 'the good guy'.  

I think the essence of a Blaylock character is their ability to see their own flaws.  That's always been the draw for me, outside of the humor and great story-lines.  This might be what's stopping some people from appreciating his work.

isabeats: I haven't read "The Sheep Look Up".  
Posted by: isabeats Posted on: 12. Jun 2006 at 00:58
This thread makes me laugh because I have yet to get anyone to read any Blaylock book, despite all my raving about them!  Once in a while I find myself getting annoyed, even angry, but then I have to laugh at myself for sounding like a cult member or something. So I tell them they don't know what they're missing and leave it at that. There is one other book I'm always trying to get friends to read (also without luck), and that's John Brunner's "The Sheep Look Up"- a pessimistic book, but I love it and have read it at least 10 times over the years. Has anyone here read it?
Posted by: M. R. Nolan Posted on: 27. May 2005 at 23:38
I did the same thing & read The Stone Giant last.
It would have been much better if I had started with that book instead of ending with it.
Posted by: B. Pulley Posted on: 05. May 2005 at 23:46
The Stone Giant is the third in the series.  But it was written as if it were the first.

Enjoy!  Smiley

B.


Posted by: mister nolan Posted on: 05. May 2005 at 01:05
I hadn't read any Blaylock but I went ahead & bought a bunch of his books this spring & The Last Coin was one based mostly on these reviews from Amazon.com. 1 sourpuss vs. 18 raves & I went ahead &  bought a copy. Then I went to this Fantasy Fiction site which lists books & authors & according to their listing The Last Coin is the 3rd of the books in the Elfin series. So I bought the other three books & started to read. Now I reach the 3rd book & find The Last Coin is not part of the Elfin series so its not going to be read for a while after all.
Posted by: Mike Posted on: 10. Aug 2004 at 10:44
I think, at least with his earlier works, Blaylock intended for people not to get it.  It's just like Andrew in "The Last Coin" telling the car mechanic that he thought the problem was caused by the 'Johnson Rods', the guy wasn't supposed to get it, that was the point.  I'm not even sure if I got that one, but I laughed.

I recommend not looking down on the ones who don't get it, after all, if everybody got it, it wouldn't be nearly as much fun.

Mike
Posted by: John Anderson Posted on: 03. Jun 2004 at 22:40
I bought The Last Coin for a friend, and she liked it OK at first, but when she got to the part about farmers growing pumpkins over secret installations (or something like that, I can't quite remember), she got it.

That's exactly the point at which I got it as well.
Posted by: Jeff M. Posted on: 24. Apr 2004 at 14:28
Yep, you definately get it Wink One of my favorite characteristics of JPB's writing is the humorous personifcation of inanimate objects or abstracts. Terry Pratchett also does an excellent job with it.

You make a great point when you mention going back and re-reading; I wonder how many authors I've decided I didn't like after reading only one book (I'm a very picky reader), that might warrant a second chance? One book that comes to mind that I did, in fact, give a second chance was Tim Power's 'On Stranger Tides', and I'm certainly glad that I did.

Jeff
Posted by: Jake Squid Posted on: 23. Apr 2004 at 17:12
Yeah, I get that reaction a lot.  But I have some understanding of it.  As I've written before somewhere, the first time I read "The Disappearing Dwarf" I thought that it was the worst book I had ever read.  Not because I disliked the story or the characters but because the writing was bizarre for fantasy.  I re-read it a week later w/ a friend and got it.  It turned into the funniest fantasy I have ever read.

Admittedly Blaylock's writing style is odd.  Bits like (and I'm paraphrasing from "The Last Coin"), "Words couldn't describe.  They wouldn't describe it.  They'd fall into a jumble of letters first," is flat out weird to most people.  But somehow I find his phrasing oddly satisfying now.  I liken it to the feeling I get listening to the lead guitar of Butthole Surfers.  How's that for weird?

I have a friend who doesn't like much other than "Homunculus" (which she thinks is a work of genius).  And another friend who only likes the most recent couple of novels.  For them it is a matter of subject & the treatment of subject.  For me and, I suspect, many others who post here the important thing is both style & theme with Blaylock novels.
Posted by: B. Pulley Posted on: 14. Jan 2004 at 12:40
[quote author=cnabokov  link=1073678312/0#0 date=1073692712]Have many of you experienced the pain of lending or recommending a Blaylock book to a friend or acquaintance and having them be either puzzled or actively hostile when they read it? I have, and generally don't recommend him much anymore unless I'm dead certain the recommendee shares my peculiar sensibilities. [/quote]


The way you describe this reminds me quite a bit of the writings of Antoine De Saint-Exupery:  

    ...I asked them if my drawing scared them.
    They answered, "Why be scared of a hat?"
    My drawing was not a picture of a hat.  It was a picture of a boa constrictor digesting an elephant...
    Whenever I encountered a grown-up who seemed to me at all enlightened, I would experiment on him with my drawing...which I have always kept.  I wanted to see if he really understood anything.  But he would always answer, "That's a hat."  Then I wouldn't talk about boa constrictors or jungles or stars.  I would put myself on his level and talk about bridge and golf and politics and neckties.  And my grown-up was glad to know such a reasonable person.

B.
Posted by: Dave_Garrett Posted on: 12. Jan 2004 at 12:23
Well, figure that only 1 of 18 "reviews" by fans/readers is negative, and you have a good indication of the trend. Blaylock is not for everyone, and that means we fans of his are in select company. In any open review forum you are likely to get reviews stating this is the worst book ever, to this is the best book ever. Personally, The Last Coin is one of my favorites and was first book I read by Blaylock. I heartily recommend it to people who I know like "different" fiction. Dave Garrett
Posted by: Forum Administrator Posted on: 09. Jan 2004 at 21:33
Some people are actively hostile to eccentricity, I think because they don't grasp nuances in characters very well - that is, characters who are just innocently goofy without being dramatically heroic or tragically flawed.

That said, it's probably a good idea to distinguish between literary criticism and personal reaction. It's easy to confuse the two, but a lot of "reviews" just end up being something that boils down to "I liked it" or "I hated it", with a few token attempts to justify the reaction in terms of literary analysis. The review on Amazon looks like one that can best be dismissed as a self-indulgent rant.