It's a complicated issue, not only because of the prevailing attitudes about publishing but for technical reasons too. How would an e-book be formatted to prevent people from just passing around a single copy a mission times, for example?

In publishing, there's also a significant stigma attached to self-publishing as opposed to going through a publisher - it tends to be taken as a sign of failure, that a book didn't deserve to be published. It's not an attitude that's completely without foundation, since a lot of junk does get self-published, but on the other hand an equal amount of junk gets accepted by publishers. Despite all of the prejudices against self-publishing, modern publishing certainly needs alternatives to the mainstream channels of publication as the industry grows increasingly centralised and closed to new authors, to back-list books, to unusual ideas, and closed to the authors with moderate sales who aren't going to become media phenomena.

Perhaps a good compromise between the multinational publishing houses and self-publishing can be found in the small presses, like Babbage, which is keeping some of the old Blaylock books in print.
Multimedia file viewing and clickable links are available for registered members only!!  You need to or !!

It may be more difficult for them to promote a previously unpublished book, though, since they would need to do some promotion to make people aware of it.

[quote author=Swancrash  link=1119141371/15#17 date=1166263598]One point: true, there are issues of people purchasing an e-book and passing it about, but there is nothing to stop someone from buying a paper copy of a book and passing it around as well.  
[/quote]

I guess the difference is that a paper copy of a book remains one copy, no matter how many people you lend it to, while an electronic file multiplies with every copy someone gives away, making it more of a problem.