Forum Administrator
|
In an interview in the Bulletin of the Science Fiction Writers of America, JPB talks about what steampunk is:
I often see steampunk categorized as dystopian fiction, for example, and often enough it is, but there’s no good reason that it should be. I’ve heard people insist that there must be steam involved, but that’s nonsense. People insist that the story must take place during Victoria’s reign, but that leaves out, say, The Anubis Gates, and most of Conan Doyle – one of my great inspirations – who arguably came into his own as an Edwardian rather than a Victorian, despite when he first began to publish. Wells, too, etc. Definitions are by definition exclusive rather than inclusive, which can be a detriment to one’s writing. For me, the great attraction of steampunk is that it allows for science and settings that are largely imaginary – space travel by gunpowder-driven engines, water-filled canals on Mars, lost cities in as yet unexplored mountains and jungles, backyard scientists pottering aboard oxygenation greenhouses in home-built spacecraft, etc. Also, it has the virtue of allowing for a language that’s richer than contemporary English. (I’ll suggest that steampunk must have that language in some incarnation.) And of course there’s an open invitation to work in an octopus or a squid, which certainly elevates any work of fiction.
|